Democratization of Information

 

 

Freedom of communication and information signifies the free flow of ideas, opinions, and knowledge. It is imperative for the free development of the personality of each person and for the cultural, social, scientific en economic development of humanity. It is a Human right

( Art.19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights ).

 

The classic freedom of the press does not comply with this principle. Though it gives the operators of state, economic and religious communication companies the right to publish without restrictions, it is hierarchical, biased, and non-interactive. It does not allow anyone to freely express ideas, opinions and knowledge, and to make them accessible to anyone else. And its products are territorially and linguistically limited and not available worldwide.

 

The electronic tool Internet presents the opportunity to overcome these impediments for free communication. It signifies the historical chance, to advance from freedom of the press to freedom of communication and to democratize information: Any citizen is entitled to publish information worldwide himself, and any other citizen has the right to receive, to judge, and to use it himself, under his own responsibility.

 

The democratization of information makes it possible, that ideas, opinions, cultural diversity, knowledge, and education will be accessible anywhere, anytime, and to everybody. The position of the citizen and his rights will be strengthened. Cultural, state, religious and economic guardianship and manipulation will be obvious. Corruption, injustice, abuse of power, and any form of terrorism will be exposed. Ignorance and the human disasters caused by it will decrease. Universal values and ethics of peaceful living together will become possible.

 

But, unfortunately, it is still a long way to a free Internet. Ignorance of the method, cost and speak a different language constitute serious barriers. Even  more grave are censorship and guardianship, -- in the form of ethical, religious, legal, financial, and technical restrictions  of access common also in allegedly civilized and democratic countries.

 

I therefore appeal to the Community of Nations and UNESCO to

1.   develop a Charter of Freedom of Communication.

2.   overcome linguistic barriers and promote polyglotism in all countries and in the Internet by concrete measures. This includes that the so far deficient translation engines have to be developed further linguistically – for example by UNESCO – and be made available gratis in Internet.

3.   eliminate knowledge-dependent, financial, and technical limitation of access within the frame of international cooperation.

4.   guarantee that all contributions existing in the Internet can actually be found. At present censorship occurs in the first place by that way that search engines do not register undesired or competing contributions, or do so incorrectly or with a disadvantage, thus making them untraceable for the citizen. In order to solve this problem I like to propose to UNESCO the development of an Universal and Multilingual Search Engine, to be directed by UNESCO.

 

By these measures the Community of Nations and UNESCO could promote truth, knowledge and diversity substantially all over the world. And make a more important contribution to education, human rights and peace than with any other method.

 

                                                                                                                      E.W. 09/11/2003

 

 

Back